»Õ§º»ÃÐÁÒ³
2530
ª×èÍâ¤Ã§¡ÒÃÇÔ¨ÑÂ
¡ÒÃŧ·Ø¹¢Í§äµéËÇѹ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â
(Taiwanese Investment in Thailand :
A Customer Satisfaction Approach)
ª×èͼÙé·ÓÇÔ¨ÑÂ
¼È.´Ã.ÍѨÃÒÇÃó
§ÒÁÒ³
¨Ó¹Ç¹Ë¹éÒ
21
˹éÒ
Abstract
This study is an attempt
to use a marketing theoretical
framework to explain the foreign
direct investment decision in
Thailand. Perceptions of Taiwanese
investors on investment in Thailand
are explored under expectation
disconfirmation model of customer
satisfaction. The perceived actual
performances of Taiwanese investors
on each factor of interest are
contrasted to their original
expectations. The results show the
negative disconfirmation and
indicate the customer
dissatisfaction upon investing in
Thailand in some respect. The
services offered to the Taiwanese
investors which are below their
expectations include some factors of
production, the benefits that the
Thai government gives to Taiwanese
investors, economic, social and
political stability in Thailand and
the return on investment. What the
Taiwanese investors consider as the
serious problems are slow government
processes, the corruption of the
government officers, and improper
treatment, the non-cooperation and
the insufficient infrastructure.
Moreover, the exploratory factor
analysis has been done on the
differences between perceived actual
performance and original
expectations to determine the
underlying dimensions of the
country’s service to foreign
investors. There are six extracted
factors. These are low cost of
production, economic, social and
political environment in Thailand,
internal supporting facilities
within Thailand, labor availability
and stability, return on investment
and encouraging Thailand policies.
The study reveals the deficiency of
the Thai government in servicing the
Taiwanese investors. It suggests
that the Thai government should
improve the service quality by
speeding the government process,
improving the country’s facilities,
stabilizing political environment
and improve the competitive
situations by creating the service
minded government officers.
Foreign direct
investment has played an important
role in expediting the economic
growth of developing countries.
Since there is generally not
sufficient accumulation of capital,
each country tries to compete in
getting foreign capital into her own
country in order to boost the
employment and consequently economic
growth of the country. Japan has
been known as a leading country in
investing in other countries
including Thailand. There are many
studies done on the Japanese
investment in Thailand so far.
However, the study on countries
which maintain high level of direct
investment in Thailand are minimal.
These countries include Hong Kong,
USA, Singapore, and Taiwan. The
figures on foreign direct investment
in Thailand from the top five
countries during the period 1985 to
1994 are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Net Flow of Foreign Direct
Investment in Thailand of the Top
Five Countries
Million baht
Year
|
Japan |
Hong Kong |
USA |
Singapore |
Taiwan |
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994 |
1,534.0
3,049.0
3,268.7
14,607.6
18,761.6
27,930.9
15,593.3
8,571.8
9,651.8
3,079.4 |
649.0
955.7
796.2
2,794.5
5,715.7
7,027.4
11,565.5
14,549.0
4,424.3
3,224.7 |
2,387.5
1,293.7
1,815.7
3,184.7
5,220.3
6,153.6
5,918.6
11,788.3
7,726.9
4,117.8 |
(1,121.9)
403.1
535.3
1,572.0
2,748.1
6,135.8
6,469.3
6,722.0
5,698.5
(2,864.8) |
170.6
132.6
687.3
4,136.3
5,062.3
7,160.0
2,753.5
2,208.8
1,539.4
2,364.1 |
1985-1994 |
106,048.1 |
51,702.0 |
49,607.1 |
26,297.4 |
25,214.9 |
Source : Bank of Thailand, as of
April 1995.
Though the ranking may be changed
year by year, the overall foreign
direct investment from Japan during
such period was the highest, about
double the amount invested by Hong
Kong which was the second. Japan
had its peak in 1990 before
declining. Hong Kong invested
heavily around 1991-1992 and then
started to decline. USA invested
the most in 1992, then the
investment had been decreased.
Singapore was exceptional in that
for some years the net foreign
direct investments were negative
which means that the Thai investors
invested in Singapore more than what
the Singaporean investors did in
Thailand. Taiwan had investment
peak in 1990, then the investment
declined. However, if the total
foreign direct investment for the
ten year period (1985-1994) is
considered, Taiwan ranked the fifth
largest investor in Thailand.
Considering the attempt
to draw investments into her own
country, there are so many selling
points that each developing country
can use to attract foreign
investment. In such case,
developing countries can compete in
offering attractive and quality
services to various investing
countries. Any country which can
offer a good bargain and satisfy
foreign investor’s needs will gain a
competitive edge within this global
market. One can consider investors’
satisfaction on their investment in
a country in a similar way to that
of customer satisfaction from buying
tangible goods and services. How
well the service quality a country
can offer to an investing country
and gain investors’ satisfaction,
will determine a constant flow of
fund to that country. Foreign
direct investment usually is
examined from the perspectives of
the economic theories. This paper,
however, will deal with foreign
direct investment, particularly that
from Taiwan, from a different
theoretical background. The
marketers’ theory of customer
satisfaction will be used to explain
the Taiwanese investment in
Thailand. Business firms compete in
satisfying their customers,
similarly, Thailand, as a country,
can ask herself how well she can
satisfy her particular customers,
which are foreign investors, in
order to attract their investment
into this country. Though the
substance of the service quality of
Thailand in satisfying foreign
investors may not be well defined,
it is unequivocal that if Thailand
can render quality service and gain
investors’ satisfaction, there
should be some strategic benefits
added to the country as a whole.
Though there are lots of
economic studies on foreign
investments as well as the studies
of service quality and customer
satisfaction in marketing literature,
few researchers have attempted to
integrate the two. This paper is an
attempt to look at some economic
constructs from marketing
perspective. The purpose of this
study is of twofold. First, the
level of expectations and
satisfaction on different aspects
offered from the Thai investors to
Taiwanese investors are
investigated. Second, a case study
of Taiwanese investors in Thailand
will be investigated using the
theoretical framework of customer
satisfaction model. The perceived
satisfaction of Taiwanese investors
is contrasted to their original
expectations to see if Thailand has
offered a customer satisfaction to
those investors. The significant
factors determining the Taiwanese
investors’ satisfaction on
investment in Thailand are explored.
Prior
work on measuring quality has been
largely done in the goods sector
especially on the Japanese firms. Recently,
the study has been undertaken on
service sector. Service quality and
customer satisfaction are hot issues
in the area of marketing for the
past decade. Distinct from the
quality of goods, service itself has
properties of intangibility,
heterogeneity, and inseparability (Parasuraman,
Zeithaml and Berry 1985). Therefore,
to measure an elusive construct like
service quality is a difficult task.
One has to get involved with
attitude measurement like
perceptions of investors in this
case. The heterogeneity character
will lead to the differences in
service that Thailand can give to
each investor. What a Taiwanese
investor receives may be entirely
different from what an American
investor or even another Taiwanese
investor receives. Those who
perform this service are numerous
|